Geo-electrical survey for the appraisal of groundwater resource in Siwalik group: a case study of Khrick Rawlakot, Azad Kashmir

Authors

  • Mehboob ur Rashid Geoscience Advance Research Laboratory Islamabad, Geological Survey of Pakistan
  • Waqas Ahmad National Centre of Excellence in Geology, University of Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Sohail Anwar National Centre of Excellence in Geology, University of Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Syed Ali Abbas Geophysics Division, Geological Survey of Pakistan Quetta
  • Sarfraz Khan National Centre of Excellence in Geology, University of Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Khawar Ashfaq Ahmed Comsats Institute, Islamabad.

Keywords:

True resistivity; Statistical Distribution; Pseudo section; Spatial model

Abstract

For the groundwater resource management, the adequate knowledge and appraisal of aquifer parameters are essential. Different conventional methods are used to estimate these parameters, which are time-consuming and costly. The advent of geophysical techniques provides a cost- effective measure to estimate aquifer parameters and groundwater potential. This study attempts to model groundwater potential in Khrick, a part of Rawlakot area, Jammu and Kashmir. A hydrogeophysical survey using Vertical Electrical Sounding (VES) is adopted to outline subsurface geology and to produce a subsurface model based on the resistivity contrast of layered rocks for evaluating the groundwater accessibility. The data is acquired using Schlumberger electrode configuration, with the current electrode (AB/2) spacing 1.5 to 250 meters and potential (MN) of 1-50 meters. The VES data show that the area is composed of topsoil, shale, clayey sandstone, fractured sandstone and compact/cemented sandstone. VES at three locations (i.e. 03, 04 and 06) indicate prospects for the groundwater potential, associated with the basement complex of a sandstone bed of Siwaliks group. The true resistivity depth section maps are prepared at 40 m, 60 m, 80 m and 100 m and compared with the geoelectrical and lithological logs showing the sandstone beds as a favourable reservoir rock with true resistivity ranging between 170-400 Ωm and thickness varying from 20-100 m. The Dar-Zarrouk parameters describing the aquifer properties are also mapped, the Transverse resistance (TR) value range between 400-6200 Ωm2, with high values, 4000-6200 Ωm2 in the Northeastern direction. The Longitudinal conductance shows good porous beds having value in the range of 0.008-0.0128 mohos with higher values in the northwestern and southwestern directions. The aquifer thickness map prepared using the resistivity data of various lithological units revealed the northeast regions are a comparatively good potential reservoir for groundwater.

References

Arshad, M., Cheema, J., Ahmed, S., 2007. Determination of lithology and groundwater quality using electrical resistivity survey. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 9, (1), 143-146.

Asiwaju Bello, Y. A., Olabode, F. O., Duvbiama, O. A., Iyamu, J. O., Adeyemo, A. A., Onigbinde, M. T., Arshad, M., Cheema, J., Ahmed, S., 2007. Determination of lithology and groundwater quality using electrical resistivity survey. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 9(1), 143-146.

Atakpo, E. A., Ayolabi, E. A., 2009. Evaluation of aquifer vulnerability and the protective capacity in some oil producing communities of western Niger Delta. The Environmentalist, 29(3), 310-317.

Bobachev, C., 2002. IPI2Win: A windows software for an automatic interpretation of resistivity sounding data Type. Thesis, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.

Borner, F., Schopper, J., Weller, A., 1996. Evaluation of transport and storage properties in the soil and groundwater zone from induced polarization measurements. Geophysical Prospecting, 44(4), 583-601.

Christensen, N. B., Sorensen, K. I., 1998. Surface and borehole electric and electromagnetic methods for hydrogeological investigations. European Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 3, 75-90.

De Lima, O. A., Clennell, M. B., Nery, G. G., Niwas, S. A., 2005. Volumetric approach for the resistivity response of freshwater shaly sandstones. Geophysics, 70(1), F1-F10.

Dhakate, R., Singh, V., 2005. Estimation of hydraulic parameters from surface geophysical methods, Kaliapani Ultramafic Complex, Orissa, India. Journal of Environmental Hydrology, 13.

Elizondo, G. M., Lofthouse, V., 2010. Towards a sustainable use of water at home: understanding how much, where and why? Journal of Sustainable Development, 3(1), 3.

Frohlich, R. K., Fisher, J. J., Summerly, E., 1996. Electric-hydraulic conductivity correlation in fractured crystalline bedrock: Central Landfill, Rhode Island, USA. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 35(4), 249-259.

Hamill, L., Bell, F. G., 2013. Groundwater resource development. Elsevier.

Heigold, P. C., Gilkeson, R. H., Cartwright, K., Reed, P. C., 1979. Aquifer transmissivity from surficial electrical methods. Groundwater, 17(4), 338-345.

Huang, Y. P., Kung, W. J., Lee, C. H., 2011. Estimating aquifer transmissivity in a basin based on stream hydrograph records using an analytical approach. Environmental Earth Sciences, 63(3), 461-468.

Hubbard, S. S., Rubin, Y., 2000. Hydrogeological parameter estimation using geophysical data: a review of selected techniques. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 45(1), 3-34.

Huntley, D., 1986. Relations between permeability and electrical resistivity in granular aquifers. Groundwater, 24(4), 466-474.

Kelly, W. E., 1977. Geoelectric sounding for estimating aquifer hydraulic conductivity. Groundwater, 15(6), 420-425.

Khalil, M. H., 2006. Geoelectric resistivity sounding for delineating salt water intrusion in the Abu Zenima area, west Sinai, Egypt. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 3(3), 243.

Loague, K., Abrams, R. H., Davis, S. N., Nguyen, A., Stewart, I. T., 1998. A case study simulation of DBCP groundwater contamination in Fresno County California & transport in the saturated subsurface. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 29 (2), 137-163.

Maillet, R., 1947. The fundamental equations of electrical prospecting. Geophysics, 12 (4), 529-556.

Martinelli, E., 1978. Groundwater exploration by geoelectrical methods in Southern Africa. Bulletin of Engineering Geology, 15 (1), 113-124.

Maury, S., Balaji, S., 2014. Geoelectrical method in the investigation of groundwater resource and related issues in Ophiolite and Flysch formations of Port Blair, Andaman Island, India. Environmental Earth Sciences, 71 (1), 183-199.

Mazac, O., Cislerova, M., Vogel, T., 1988. Application of geophysical methods in describing spatial variability of saturated hydraulic conductivity in the zone of aeration. Journal of Hydrology 103 (1-2), 117-126.

Mazac, O., Kelly, W., Landa, I. A., 1985. hydrogeophysical model for relations between electrical and hydraulic properties of aquifers. Journal of Hydrology, 79(1-2), 1-19.

Nadeem, F., 2015. Pakistan Monsoon 2015 Rainfall. CDPC Technical Report, 4. Niwas, S., Gupta, P. K., de Lima, O. A., 2006. Nonlinear electrical response of saturated shaley sand reservoir and its asymptotic approximations. Geophysics 71(3), G129-G133.

Niwas, S., Lima, O. A., 2003. Aquifer parameter estimation from surface resistivity data. Groundwater, 41(1), 94-99.

Ojelabi, E., Badmus, B., Salau, A., 2002. Comparative analysis of Wenner and Schlumberger Methods of Geoelectric Sounding in subsurface Delineation and groundwater exploration-A case study. Geological Society of India, 60(6), 623-628.

Organization, W. H., 2006. Protecting Ground Water for Health-Managing the Quality of Drinking-water Sources: World Health Organization.

Panagiotakis, I., Dermatas, D., Vatseris, C., Chrysochoou, M., Papassiopi, N., Xenidis, A., Vaxevanidou, K., 2015. Forensic investigation of a chromium (VI) groundwater plume in Thiva, Greece. Journal of hazardous materials, 281, 27-34.

Rubin, Y., Hubbard, S. S., 2006. Hydrogeophysics: Springer Science & Business Media, 50.

Salem, H. S., 1999. Determination of fluid transmissivity and electric transverse resistance for shallow aquifers and deep reservoirs from surface and well- log electric measurements. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 3(3), 421-427.

Shah, S. M. I., 2009. Stratigraphy of Pakistan, Geological Survey of Pakistan Publication Directorate, Quetta Pakistan, 22, 381.

Telford, W. M., Geldart, L. P., Sheriff, R. E., 1990. Applied geophysics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Thakur, V., Jayangondaperumal, R., Malik, M., 2010. Redefining Medlicott–Wadia's main boundary fault from Jhelum to Yamuna: An active fault strand of the main boundary thrust in northwest Himalaya. Tectonophysics, 489, (1), 29-42.

VenkataRao, G., Kalpana, P., Rao, R. S., 2014. Groundwater investigation using geophysical methods-a case study of Pydibhimavaram Industrial area. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology 3, 13-17.

Nasir, S., Hussain, A., Akhtar, S. S., 2004. Geological map of Thorar Area District Rawlakot AJK and part of Rawalpindi District Pakistan 43G/9. Geological Survey of Pakistan Publication Directorate Quetta, 19, 1-1.

Yang, C. S., Kao, S. P., Lee, F. B., Hung, P. S., 2004. In Twelve different interpolation methods: A case study of Surfer 8.0, Proceedings of the XXth ISPRS Congress, 2004, 778-785.

Zektser, I. S., Lorne, E., 2004. Groundwater Resources of the World and their Use. 6th ed., Unesco place de Fontenoy Paris: France, 342.

Downloads

Published

2018-03-31

How to Cite

Rashid, M. ur ., Ahmad, W., Anwar, S., Abbas, S. A., Khan, S., & Ahmed, K. A. (2018). Geo-electrical survey for the appraisal of groundwater resource in Siwalik group: a case study of Khrick Rawlakot, Azad Kashmir. Journal of Himalayan Earth Sciences, 51(1), 44-60. Retrieved from http://ojs.uop.edu.pk/jhes/article/view/1873

Most read articles by the same author(s)