Evaluating the predicting performance of indirect methods for estimation of rock mass deformation modulus using inductive modelling techniques

Authors

  • Sajjad Hussain Department of Mining Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Mujahid Khan Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Zahid Ur Rahman Department of Mining Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Noor Mohammad Department of Mining Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Salim Raza Department of Mining Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Tahir Department of Mining Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Ishaq Ahmad Department of Mining Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Saira Sherin Department of Mining Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Naser Muhammad Khan Department of Mining Engineering, BUITEMS Quetta, Pakistan

Keywords:

Deformation modulus; Multi Liner Regression (MRL); Artificial Neural Network (ANN).

Abstract

The rock mass deformation modulus is an important parameter in numerical modeling for the stability analysis of tunnels and underground excavations. This parameter can be determined by direct and indirect methods. The direct method includes in-situ tests which are costly, timing consuming and the reliability of the result is also questionable. In indirect method different empirical models are used for estimation of rock mass deformation modulus. In this paper Rock Mass Rating (RMR), Geological Strength Index (GSI), Young Modulus of Elasticity and Uniaxial Compressive Strength (UCS) were used as input parameters in empirical models for determination of deformation modulus for rock mass. The Multi Liner Regression (MLR) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) were used for assessment of the prediction performance of different established empirical models for estimation deformation modulus for rock mass. After analysis and comparison of results obtained from MLR and ANN, it was concluded that, the ANN based model predicting performance is better as compared to MLR model for all five data sets and the performance of both models is much better for those data sets which are collected from empirical equation containing three input variables.

References

Barton, N., Lien, R., Lunde, J., 1974. Rock Mass Characterization and Support Design for Underground Additional Surge Pool Cavern. Rock Mechanics, 6(4), 189-236.

Beiki, M., Bashari A., Majdi A., 2010. Genetic programming for estimation of deformation modulus for rock mass using sensitivity analysis by neural network. International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences, 47, 1091-1103.

Bieniawski, Z.T., 1973. Engineering classification of rock masses, 335-344.

Candan, G., Ertan, Y., Harun, S., Ali, K., 2004. A neuro-fuzzy model for modulus of deformation of jointed rock masses. Computers and Geotechnics, 31, 375-383.

Carvalho., 2004. Estimation of rock mass modulus. Dinc, O.S., Sonmez, H., Tunusluoglu, C., Kasapoglu, K.E., 2011. A new general empirical approa- ch for the predict ion of rock mass strengths of soft to hard rock masses. International Journal of Mining Sciences, 48, 650-665.

Ebrahim, G. R., Reza, R., Amir, E. F. M., Esmaeil, G. R., 2013. Application of numerical modeling and genetic programming to estimate rock mass modulus of deformation. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 23, 733-737.

Gholamneja, J., Bahaaddini, H.R., Rastegar, M., 2013. Prediction of the deformation modulus of rock masses using Artificial Neural Networks and Regression methods. Journal of Mining & Environment, 4(1), 35-43.

Gokceoglu, C., Zorlu, K. A., 2004. Fuzzy model to predict the uniaxial compressive strength and the modulus of elasticity of a problematic rock. Journal of Engineering, 17, 61-72.

Grima, M.A., Babuska, R., 1999. Fuzzy model for the prediction of unconfined compressive strength of rock samples. International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences, 36, 339-349.

Hoek, E., Diederichs, M.S., 2006. Empirical estimation of rock mass modulus. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 43, 203-215.

Hoek, E., Brown, E.T., 1997. Practical estimates of rock mass strength. International journal of Rock Mechanics and Mineral Science, 34(8), 1165-86.

Jiayi, S., Murat, K., Chaoshui, Xu., 2012. A comparative study for empirical equations in estimating deformation modulus of rock masses. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 32, 245-250.

Jing, L., 2003. A reviewof techniques, advances and outstanding issues in numerical modelling for rock mechanics and rock engineering. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 283-353.

Kayabasi, A., Gokceoglub, C., Ercanoglu, M., 2003. Estimating the deformation modulus of rock masses: a comparative study. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 40, 55-63.

Khabbazi, A., Ghafoori, M., Lashkaripour, G.R., Cheshomi, A., 2013. Estimation of rock mass deformation modulus using a rock mass classification system. Geomechanics and Geoengineering, 8(1), 46-52.

Lingireddy., Brion, S., Chandaramouli., Neelakanatan., 2003. Neural Network Modeling Software for Water and Environmental Engineering. Lexington, Kentucky: Civil Engineering Department, University of Kentucky.

Nicholson, G.A., Bieniawski, Z. T., 1990. A nonlinear deformation modulus based on rock mass classification. International journal of Mining and geological engineering, 8, 181-202.

Okay, A., Melih, G., Gülsev, U. A., Vehbi, Ö., Samet, Ö., Özgür, Y., 2012. A comparative study of the determination of rock mass deformation modulus by using different empirical approaches. Engineering Geology, 131, 19-28.

Rahmannejad., Hamid, M., Reza., 2010. The estimation of rock mass deformation modulus using regression and artificial neural networks analysis. The Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 35-38.

Ribacchi, R., 1988. Rock mass deformability; in situ tests, their interpretation and typical results in Italy. Proceedings of the second international symposium on field measurements in geomechanics, 234-245.

Sajjad, H., Noor, M., Zahid, R., Tahir, M., Nisar, M., 2017. charecterization of Rock mass along tunnel axis for golen gole hydropower project Chitral. Journal of Himalayan Earth Sciences, 49(2), 75-83.

Singh, V.K., Singh, D., Singh, T.N., 2001.

Prediction of strength properties of some schistose rocks from petrographic properties using artificial neural networks. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 38, 269-284.

Sonmeza, H., Gokceoglua, C., Nefeslioglub., Kayabasic, A., 2006. Estimation of rock modulus: For intact rocks with an artificial neural network and for rock masses with a new empirical equation. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 46, 224-235.

Tiryaki, B., 2008. Predicting intact rock strength for mechanical excavation using multivariate statistics, artificial neural networks, and regression trees. Engineering Geology, 99, 51-60.

Tutmez, B., Tercan, A. E., 2007. Spatial estimation of some mechanical properties of rocks by fuzzy modeling. Computer and Geotechnical, 34, 10-18.

Zurada, J. M., 1992. Introduction to artificial neural systems. Boston, PWS Publishing Company, 764-770.

Downloads

Published

2018-03-31

How to Cite

Hussain, S., Khan, M., Zahid Ur Rahman, Mohammad, N., Raza, S., Tahir, M., Ahmad, I., Sherin, S., & Khan, N. M. (2018). Evaluating the predicting performance of indirect methods for estimation of rock mass deformation modulus using inductive modelling techniques. Journal of Himalayan Earth Sciences, 51(1), 61-74. Retrieved from http://ojs.uop.edu.pk/jhes/article/view/1874

Most read articles by the same author(s)