Impact of DEM resolution and accuracy on remote sensing and topographic DEM derived topographic attributes and drainage pattern

Authors

  • Misbah Amjad National Centre of Excellence in Geology, University of Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Zeeshan Ali Institute of Space Technology, Islamabad
  • Muhammad Shafique National Centre of Excellence in Geology, University of Peshawar, Pakistan

Keywords:

DEM; Monte Carlo simulation; Hydrological modeling; Accuracy assessment

Abstract

Digital Elevation Model (DEM) presents the digital representation of surface topography. DEMs can be derived from satellite remote sensing or conventional techniques of surveying. However, inherent errors in a remote sensing based DEMs can lead to uncertainty in the elevation data and computed topographic attributes. This study evaluates accuracy of remote sensing derived SRTM and ASTER DEMs and physical survey derived Topographic maps. For accuracy assessment of the ASTER and SRTM ASTER DEMs, spot elevation were extracted from the toposheet as a reference data. Accuracy assessment results reveals that the SRTM DEM shows RMSE of ±27 m and ASTER DEM shows RMSE of ±20 m in the study area. The impact of random errors in the ASTER and SRTM DEMs on the derived topographic attributes (aspect and slope) is evaluated through the Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS). Derived results show higher uncertainty in topographical attributes (aspect and slope) derived from the ASTER DEM than from the SRTM DEM. Results derived from the ASTER DEM shows that mean of slope can deviate 1.2° whereas, SRTM DEM shows it can deviate 0.8°. Aspect derived from the ASTER DEM can deviate up to 31.2° whereas, aspect computed from the SRTM DEM can deviate up to 29.8°. The drainage networks computed from the ASTER, SRTM DEMs and Toposheet are also compared. The analysis revealed that the drainage network extracted from the SRTM DEM, ASTER DEM and Toposheet are matching.

References

Castrignanò, A., Buttafuoco, G., Comolli, R., Ballabio, C., 2006. Accuracy assessment of digital elevation model using stochastic simulation. 7th International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, Citeseer.

Gong, J., Li, Z., Zhu, Q. Sui, H., Zhou, Y., 2000. Effects of various factors on the accuracy of DEMs: an intensive experimental investigation. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 66(9), 1113-1117.

Gopinath, G., Swetha, T., Ashitha, M., 2014. Automated extraction of watershed boundary and drainage network from SRTM and comparison with Survey of India toposheet. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 7(7), 2625-2632.

Nikolakopoulos, K. G., Kamaratakis, E. K., Chrysoulakis, N., 2006. SRTM vs ASTER elevation products: Comparison for two regions in Crete, Greece. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 27(21), 4819-4838.

Raaflaub, L. D., Collins, M. J., 2006. The effect of error in gridded digital elevation models on the estimation of topographic parameters. Environmental Modelling and Software, 21(5), 710-732.

Rodríguez, E., Morris, C. S. J., Belz, E., 2013. A Global Assessment of SRTM Performance. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 72(3), 249-260.

Shafique, M. (2008). Predicting topographic aggravation of seismic ground shaking using geospatial tools (A case study of Kashmir Earthquake, Pakistan). Msc, International Institute of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation Enschede.

Shafique, M., Israr, S., Shah, M. T., Khan, M. A., 2014. Remote sensing based strategy of stream sediment sampling for mineral exploration in Peshawar Basin, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Journal of Himalayan Earth Sciences, 47(2), 141-148.

Shafique, M., Van der Meijde, M., 2015. Impact of uncertainty in remote sensing DEMs on topographic amplification of seismic response and Vs 30. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 8(4), 2237-2245.

Smith, B., Sandwell, D., 2003. Accuracy and resolution of shuttle radar topography mission data. Geophysical Research Letters, 30(9), 1467.

Wechsler, S., 2007. Uncertainties associated with digital elevation models for hydrologic applications: a review. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 11(4), 1481-1500.

Wechsler, S. P., 2003. Perceptions of Digital Elevation Model Uncertainty by DEM Users. URISA Journal, 15, 57-64.

Wechsler, S. P., Kroll, C. N., 2006. Quantifying DEM Uncertainty and its Effect on Topographic Parameters. Photogrammetric Engineering a n d Remote Sensing, 72(9), 1081-1090.

Zhou, Q., X. Liu., 2004. Analysis of errors of derived slope and aspect related to DEM data properties. Computers and Geosciences, 30(4), 369-378.

Downloads

Published

2016-11-30

How to Cite

Amjad, M., Ali, M. Z., & Shafique, M. (2016). Impact of DEM resolution and accuracy on remote sensing and topographic DEM derived topographic attributes and drainage pattern. Journal of Himalayan Earth Sciences, 49(2), 109-117. Retrieved from http://ojs.uop.edu.pk/jhes/article/view/1920

Most read articles by the same author(s)